Followers

ok go!

Wednesday, 23 July 2008

55 Baker St.



























Things to do today:

1. go to the cafe to get bacon rolls

2. make a map depicting the Fire Assembly Location Plan in MSWord '98... staple on all fire doors

3. rock out while doing Elliots expenses (because if I wasn't rocking out I might murder myself)

4. walk around the site and take pictures (occasionally for progress reports, more often because I can pretend I know what I'm doing)



5. flirt with construction worker (singular)

6. make coffee and tea for meetings



7. print and file things

8. be generally friendly with subcontractors/ architect/ client etc.


9. order office supplies (we just got a laminator, which makes my signs look sweeeeeet)

10. call Paul the IT guy

11. write coi's, si's, rfi's, daily reports... yea you know-- or you don't!

12. request things from CAD tech Dan at KKS Architects



13. arrange and laminate Adrians recipe clippings

14. issue the risk assessment and method statement for the site barbeque on the gantry (scaffolding)



... this job wakes me up in the morning







This is Maciek installing the Fire Detection System in the office:



Maciek is the foreman, and very Polish. He's cool, we talk a lot but we can't really understand each other.



This is my boss Adrian. He is very Welsh. Also a huge bacon roll fan.



Last week we got a generator installed in the basement... it was a pretty big deal:







I've got to stop eating those bacon rolls

Monday, 14 July 2008

I wrote this a week ago but oh well

In making this trip I've failed to consider Longitude. It is cold in London. At home I'd be walking around the house in a bathing suit. So aside from the ten summer dresses, I have one sweatshirt, one jacket, three pairs of pants and two long sleeved shirts. Good thing I'm so down with layers.

I also resumed drinking like a fish as soon as my jet lag wore off. On top of the excursions with Jess (Katie + Jess = team half pint) -- walking the monuments and then spending £4 on a sandwich and Stella at Tesco which we consumed in the corner of Trafalgars Square, drinking bottles of wine on Hampton Court gardens at the Flower Show -- my cuz Stephen has also proven a very worthy accomplice; as have all his old/my new flatmates. Stephens favorite thing to do at the pub is play "Dares", which is exactly what it sounds like. I just so happen to be a Dares natural... probably from all the "The Question Game's" in the Great Space.

I moved into my new flat a little over a week ago, the same day they published two stories about fatal stabbings in my new hood. It's seedy-- you know I do. It's also around the corner from where my Nan grew up and had my Dad, so heritage is sweet.

The first two weeks I was doing daily London Festival of Architecture events, most of which are fantastic. The first one was an Eric Parry lecture at St. Martin in the Fields (not actually in the Fields). Of course, after a long day of walking and a sandwich/stella -- and in true Katie fashion, I was falling asleep for the first half of the lecture. I even fell onto the guy next to me. He was not amused. It reminded me of the time I just about fell off my chair at the Mario Botta lecture. Anyway I'm not sure how I feel about Eric Perry's intervention at St. Martins (architect James Gibbs and major urban intervention by John Nash). He's put two giant lightwells to the north side of the church to access the crypt and rooms below. They are basically big glass pods the plan of which is two overlapping circles (think Scarpa, whom Perry referenced among others). The placement/orientation of the wells are good. As far as the circles I'm not so convinced. First of all I'm wary of Architectural references that serve Architects only -- yes perhaps randoms could look at the wells and read two overlapping circles and find some cosmological meaning-- but my thought is that non-Architects don't read buildings in plan at all, and ofter have a hard time understanding such an abstraction. Scarpa's circles are good because the symbol is legible, simple, clear and mostly vertically registered. Perry's seems a bit arbitrary in comparision I suppose. But this is a more minor point -- construction is still underway and they should be ready by next summer so we'll hold out judgement until then. Funilly (is that a word, it looks weird) enough I went to a lunch talk where Sarah Wigglesworth and Rowan Moore were discussing "Communicating Architecture", and Sarah talked a lot about graphic abstractions of Orthographic Drawings and how hard they are for people to understand, sometimes even architects.

So last Wednesday I got two jobs in one day, which is great. The first is working for a Contractor on the site of a new office building. I just happened to wander into a recruiters office and within five minutes they had the job for me. I absolutely love it! I work in a temporary office on site -- I have my own hard hat, vest and site boots -- with between one and five 30 year old contractors. They are super nice and hilarious, I'm sure you can image little me running around an office filled with British contractors... I'll take pictures. Our office is basically a satelite from the main office which is a renovations office fit out firm. The project is running until November so I'm going to get to see the whole fit out take place. AND, sweet coincident, I was in Make's Open Studio last week and I saw a building that they'd just put up in London, so I wrote down the address and when I turned up to my first day of work I just happen to be in that very building!! Half of it is already occupied and half is underconstruction by yours truly. I'm sort of doing admin stuff but it's mostly dealing with the construction drawings, so I've gone from one end of the spectrum to the other in one year. My other job is one shift on weekends at our local pub, Walpole in New Cross, which is the British equivalent of The Looking Glass Lounge. I'm bartending with this cute Welsh chick named Ruth who is fantastic.

So funny observations... OJ here is not pulp or no pulp but "with or without juicy bits". Ha. Also, its about 80 F outside and the loudspeaker in the tube is warning people not to get on trains if they feel sick and to remember to carry water. Pfsh!

Drinking beers in the street is allowed but somewhat taboo.

Fun fact: Apparently they drive on the wrong side of the road because of jousting. Yup, jousters carry their jousts with their left arm and so ancient Roman roads were layed out accordingly.

So then, why do we drive on the other side? Probably just to be different.

Saturday, 5 July 2008

Monday, 30 June 2008

goodnight moon

I haven't blogged in so long I don't know where to start. I'm torn between the following...

1. paying homage to this house and all the memories it holds for us; as it so perfect to post the pictures of our last day at 4504, comparable to Sarah's first day and the Beer Olympics;












2. mocking my last relationship and its pathetic end as an explanation for my lack of bloggish activity (and obviously also because it would be momentarily satisfying to publicize my resentment);





3. getting ya'll pumped about my plans for London.






All these events are part of the London Festival of Architecture:
http://www.lfa2008.org/index.php
which will still be in swing for three weeks after I arrive. This week I'm staying with Jess and friends in the swank student residence NIDO (check out the sweet animation):
http://www.nidokingscross.com/#
and conveniently my cousin, with unbeatable rent, is moving out next weekend and so I'm taking his place in a flat of four in New Cross, SE London. The rest is looking for a job and running amuck with Jess until the end of August when she leaves and Dad fly's in for a week for Gma's 90th birthday.




I just feel good karma right now. The world is unfolding as it should. Maybe it's the Secret.

Stay tuned. I'ma try to keep all you arch enthusiasts swimming in eye candy from the LFA jamboree.

*And special thanks to Brian WatZIN for encouraging me to man up on this blog.

Saturday, 26 April 2008

Graduation

I'm leaving June 30 for London. That is all.

Thursday, 27 December 2007

"The thing that is troubling me lately is how to enjoy life/architecture now. We're screwing up the planet, smearing everything good about it. Should we just sit and worry about impending doom? How do I enjoy today when I know we're screwed in the future? If there is a meaning to life, and I believe that there is, how do we find it? How do we do the right thing with what we have in the situation we're in? Will opportunities come? or are they made? Do you get what i'm saying? Things just seem so overwhelming when you look at the big picture, a big picture that has a dramatic OH SHIT moment at the end of it. How can i get around this? Any ideas?"

Saturday, 8 December 2007

Read. Ponder. Share. Challenge me.

I'm struggling with my architecture this semester. I've embraced green ideas and strategies and believe so fundamentally that this is the new modernism; a greater response to International Style and Industrialization. Mostly I'm struggling with forms and appearance. I'm not obsessed with "ideal" forms but I don't feel that my building designs embody my ideas. My buildings become containers for ideas, rather than the ideas themselves. I just don't know how to do the latter. In the Apartment Project I was aware of this shortcoming, but my jury either didn't pick up on it or never mentioned it. In the Library Project we just completed they did. He said it's almost as if I didn't need to talk about the building, that the other issues and ideas I was exploring were another aspect of architecture that we don't always appreciate fully. So of course I'm thinking, yea buddy ok well this is 402 studio I had to make a building, and I asked him how I could have both (because I'm not going to stop looking at cultural exigencies but I have to be a better designer-- because thats just how I am). He said "simplify", in many more words. I thought about it and I agree, totally valid and I can do that. I think I get it. This is a skill I haven't practiced, especially not in Courtney's studio where we work hard to generate and explore concepts but less on editing and refining them.

Now I'm reading Cradle to Cradle which says that the goals if the International Style were social as well as aesthetic, which has evolved into "a bland, uniform structure isolated from the particulars of place--from local culture, nature, energy, and material flows...[which] reflect little if any of a regions distinctness of style."

I believe in this (green) as a movement because I believe in architecture's ability to catalyze and embody social changes. That's why this needs to be a movement and this movement will inevitably need to be a "style" (think "style" as in imageability).

What is this image?

It seems obvious to say it's place specific. Does it embody the contemporary place or does it embody what we believe the place should be? (ie. does it look like DC now or does it look like what I feel DC should look like)

Is there a more specific form than: long rectangular bar building with greater exposure in the N/S directions.

In his lecture for Emerging Green Builders, Prof. Etlin talked about new green buildings looking "machine-like". This is odd to me considering that loads of 21st century architecture is based on the machine metaphor. I need some examples to know exactly what he has in mind. So if the machine is the metaphor for Modernist aesthetics, and arbitrary expression is the aesthetic for post-modernist/contemporary architecture, what is the metaphor for green revolution architecture? Is it biomimicry?

How obvious does this metaphor need to be? I ask this because I feel that, at least for now, building users need to understand the breadth of possibilities for sustainable architecture but also how it works so it can influence their own environmental consciousness. I think it was less necessary for everyone to understand that the Unite d'Habitation was a ship... I mean it reflects some communistic ideas about dense living which I'm all for but I'm talking about buildings that scream "I'm carbon positive and look how comfortable you are."

"Consider this: all the ants on the planet, taken together, have a biomass greater than that of humans. Ants have been incredibly industrious for millions of years. Yet their productiveness nourishes plants, animals and soil. Human industry has been in full swing for little over a century, yet it has brought about a decline in almost every ecosystem on the planet. Nature doesn't have a design problem. People do." Cradle to Cradle. 16.